The U.S. Justice Department has determined that multiple layers of removal restrictions shielding administrative law judges ...

The Justice Department said a law protecting the officials from arbitrary removal is an unconstitutional intrusion on ...

The Justice Department issued a letter on Thursday saying the agency concluded that many removal restrictions for ...

The U.S. Justice Department has declared that removal restrictions protecting administrative law judges are unconstitutional.

DOJ determined that “multiple layers” of removal restrictions “shielding administrative law judges (ALJs) are unconstitutional,” Chief of Staff Chad Mizelle says in statement.

The judge considering a challenge to President Donald Trump’s executive order banning transgender individuals from the ...

In a Feb. 20 letter, the acting solicitor general wrote that the “multiple layers of removal protections” for administrative ...

The U.S. Justice Department has decided that the protection layers for administrative law judges are unconstitutional, ending ...

Sarah Harris sent a letter to President Pro Tempore of the US Senate Charles Grassley on Thursday sharing the DOJ's determination that ...

Chad Mizelle, said the restrictions would apply to prosecutions under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, a 1994 law that prohibits physically interfering with someone who is ...

The Trump administration argues that President Trump has the constitutional power to fire administrative law judges without cause, challenging existing protections against political interference.